An Evidence-Based* Synthesis of Exercise Modalities for the Management of Osteoporosis

Introduction: The Mechanical and Metabolic Imperative of Exercise in Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease characterized not merely by low bone mineral density (BMD), but more critically, by a deterioration of bone microarchitecture that compromises bone strength and elevates the risk of fracture.¹ Often termed a "silent disease," its presence may go unnoticed until a fall or even a minor stress, such as coughing, results in a fragility fracture, most commonly occurring at the hip, spine, or wrist.¹ The management of osteoporosis, therefore, requires a multifaceted approach aimed at both preserving existing bone mass and reducing the risk of fracture-inducing events. While pharmacological therapies are a cornerstone of treatment for many, a structured, evidence-based exercise prescription stands as the primary non-pharmacological strategy for both prevention and management.⁵ 

The efficacy of exercise in bone health is rooted in the fundamental biological principle of mechanotransduction. Bone is a dynamic, living tissue that intelligently adapts to the mechanical loads it habitually experiences.⁸ This adaptive process is orchestrated by osteocytes, the most abundant cells in bone, which are embedded within the bone matrix. These cells act as mechanosensors, detecting strain from physical activity. When subjected to sufficient mechanical loading, osteocytes translate these physical signals into a cascade of biochemical responses. This process involves the regulation of bone remodeling cells: osteoblasts, which are responsible for bone formation, and osteoclasts, which are responsible for bone resorption.⁹ A key molecule in this pathway is sclerostin, a protein secreted by osteocytes that acts as a powerful inhibitor of bone formation. Mechanical loading has been shown to down-regulate sclerostin expression, effectively "releasing the brakes" on osteoblasts and creating a more anabolic, or bone-building, environment . This establishes the profound scientific rationale for why specific types of exercise are not just beneficial, but essential for skeletal integrity. 

The benefits of a well-designed exercise program extend far beyond direct effects on BMD. An integrated regimen improves muscle strength, enhances balance and coordination, and promotes better posture. These adaptations are critical for reducing the risk of falls, which are the precipitating event for the vast majority of osteoporotic fractures in older adults.¹¹ This report provides a comprehensive, evidence-based synthesis of current exercise guidelines and modalities for the management of osteoporosis, critically evaluating the scientific literature to formulate clear, actionable recommendations. 

1. Cardiovascular Health Guidelines for Individuals with Osteoporosis

A foundational component of any comprehensive exercise program for osteoporosis is cardiovascular, or aerobic, activity. The guidelines established by leading global health organizations, including the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM), the Royal Osteoporosis Society (ROS), and Osteoporosis Canada, provide a clear framework based on the FITT-VP principles: Frequency, Intensity, Time, Type, Volume, and Progression. 

Frequency: Establishing a Consistent Stimulus

 To effectively influence bone health and overall fitness, cardiovascular exercise must be performed regularly. There is a strong consensus among major health bodies that individuals should be active on most days of the week.¹⁵ Specifically, the ACSM and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend a minimum frequency of three to five days per week for moderate-intensity aerobic activity, with the goal of working up to five days a week.⁵ This recommendation is strongly supported by Osteoporosis Canada, which advises engaging in physical activity on five or more days of the week.¹⁰ The underlying rationale for this high frequency is to provide a regular mechanical and metabolic stimulus to the musculoskeletal system and to avoid the detrimental effects of prolonged periods of inactivity, which are known to accelerate bone loss.⁷ 

Intensity: The Key to Efficacy and Safety

The intensity of exercise is perhaps the most critical variable to manage, as it dictates both the effectiveness of the stimulus and the safety of the activity.

Moderate Intensity as the Standard: The prevailing recommendation for individuals with osteoporosis is to engage in exercise of moderate intensity.⁵ A practical and widely endorsed method for gauging this intensity is the "talk test." An individual exercising at a moderate level should experience a noticeable increase in heart rate and breathing but still be able to carry on a conversation. They would, however, be too breathless to sing a song comfortably.¹⁵ On a scale of perceived exertion, this corresponds to a rating of "somewhat hard," or a 3–4 on the 10-point Borg CR-10 scale.²⁵ 

Target Heart Rate (THR) Zones: For a more quantitative approach, intensity can be monitored using target heart rate zones. Maximum heart rate (HRmax) is estimated by subtracting one's age from 220 . Moderate intensity corresponds to a THR zone of 50% to 70% of HRmax, while vigorous intensity falls between 70% and 85% of HRmax . For example, a 65-year-old individual has an estimated HRmax of 155 beats per minute (bpm). Their moderate-intensity THR zone would be approximately 78–108 bpm, and their vigorous-intensity zone would be 108–132 bpm .

Vigorous Intensity: While moderate intensity forms the baseline recommendation, guidelines also accommodate vigorous-intensity activity, such as jogging or running, for individuals who are physically capable.¹⁵ Opting for vigorous exercise allows for the achievement of health benefits in a shorter amount of time. The decision to engage in vigorous-intensity exercise should be made in consultation with a healthcare provider and should be based on the individual's overall fitness, fracture risk profile, and personal preference.²⁶ 

Time and Volume: Accumulating Sufficient Stimulus

The total amount of exercise performed per week, or volume, is a key determinant of health outcomes. The consensus guideline from the ACSM, CDC, and other international bodies is a minimum of 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity per week.¹⁵ If an individual chooses to perform vigorous-intensity exercise, the target volume is reduced to  

75 minutes of vigorous-intensity activity per week.¹⁵ It is also acceptable to perform an equivalent combination of moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity throughout the week. 

This weekly volume can be achieved through sessions lasting 30 to 60 minutes.¹⁵ For individuals who are deconditioned or find longer sessions daunting, the guidelines offer crucial flexibility: the total activity time can be accumulated in shorter bouts of at least 10 minutes each.¹⁵ This approach makes it more feasible for nearly everyone to meet the weekly recommendations. 

Type: The Critical Importance of Weight-Bearing Activity

The type of cardiovascular exercise chosen is of paramount importance for individuals with osteoporosis. The mechanical forces generated during exercise are the primary stimulus for bone adaptation.

Defining and Prioritizing Weight-Bearing Exercise: Weight-bearing exercise is defined as any activity performed while on your feet, which forces the bones and muscles to work against gravity to support the body's weight . A robust body of evidence demonstrates that this type of exercise is superior for stimulating bone, particularly at the clinically important sites of the hip and spine.¹¹ Recommended examples include brisk walking, dancing, stair climbing, hiking, and low-impact aerobics . 

The Role of Non-Weight-Bearing Activities: Activities such as swimming, water aerobics, and cycling are excellent for improving cardiovascular health and are often recommended as safe options for individuals with severe osteoporosis, a history of vertebral fractures, or significant joint pain . However, it is critical to understand that because the water or the bicycle supports the body's weight, these activities provide minimal osteogenic stimulus and do little to improve bone mass . Therefore, while valuable for general health, they should not be the sole form of exercise for bone health and should be supplemented with weight-bearing activities whenever possible and safe.

The distinction between different types of exercise reveals a fundamental tension in prescribing activity for osteoporosis: the need to maximize the bone-building stimulus must be balanced against the need to ensure safety. The biological process of mechanotransduction requires a mechanical strain of sufficient magnitude to trigger an adaptive response.⁹ High-impact activities like jumping generate significantly greater ground reaction forces, and thus greater strain, than low-impact activities like walking.²¹ However, the very nature of osteoporosis is that bones are more fragile and susceptible to fracture from high-impact forces.¹⁵ This creates a paradox where the most potent exercises may also carry the greatest risk. Consequently, the optimal recommendation for most individuals with osteoporosis is  

moderate-impact, weight-bearing activity. This provides a sufficient stimulus to slow bone loss and strengthen bone without introducing the high fracture risk associated with more explosive movements. This nuanced understanding explains the consistent recommendation of activities like brisk walking, dancing, and low-impact aerobics, which occupy this therapeutic middle ground.²⁶ The role of the healthcare or fitness professional is to titrate the level of impact based on the individual's specific fracture risk profile, allowing for a truly personalized and safe prescription. 

Progression and Safety: Individualization and Contraindications

A safe exercise program is paramount. For individuals who have been inactive, a gradual approach is essential. Starting with shorter sessions of 10 to 15 minutes and slowly increasing the duration and frequency every two to four weeks allows the body to adapt and reduces the risk of injury, thereby improving long-term adherence.¹⁵ 

For individuals with diagnosed osteoporosis, particularly those with a history of vertebral fractures, certain movements are contraindicated due to the risk of inducing a fracture. These must be avoided :

• High-Impact Activities: Activities involving jumping, running, or jogging should be avoided by those with a high fracture risk, as the jarring forces can overload weakened bones .

• Exercises with Trunk Flexion: Bending forward from the waist, as seen in exercises like sit-ups, crunches, or toe touches, places significant compressive force on the front of the vertebral bodies and must be avoided .

• Exercises with Forceful Trunk Twisting: Movements that combine bending and twisting, such as a golf swing, or certain yoga and Pilates poses, can create dangerous rotational forces on the spine and should be avoided or significantly modified .

Finally, the universal recommendation from all health authorities is that individuals with osteoporosis should consult with their healthcare provider or a qualified exercise professional, such as a physical therapist, before beginning any new exercise program to ensure it is both safe and effective for their specific condition.³¹ 

2. An Evidence-Based Summary of the Osteo-Gains Plyometric Programme

The Osteo-Gains program is a commercially available, app-based plyometric (jump training) exercise regimen designed to improve bone health.⁵³ Developed by a team of researchers in New Zealand, including Dr. Tracey Clissold, the program is based on research into the osteogenic (bone-building) effects of specific jump-landing exercises.⁵² 

Program Overview and Scientific Rationale

The Osteo-Gains program is structured as a 52-week plan, delivered via a mobile app, that guides users through progressively more difficult jump-landing exercises.⁵³ The core of the program consists of very brief daily sessions, lasting only 2 to 5 minutes, performed 2 to 5 times per week.⁵³ The program is built on the principle that bone responds to high-magnitude, high-rate mechanical loads, and that short, intermittent bouts of such loading can be effective.⁵⁴ 

The scientific foundation for Osteo-Gains stems from a 12-month randomized controlled trial conducted by its creators, which focused on pre-menopausal women aged 30 to 51.⁵² This research identified seven specific jump types, including multidirectional jumps like star jumps and stride jumps, that produced ground reaction forces exceeding the theoretical osteogenic threshold of 3 times body weight.⁵⁴ In the trial, the jump group performed approximately 20 double-jump combinations per session.⁵⁶ The study reported that participants in the jump group saw significant improvements in bone mineral density (BMD) of 3.5% to 5% at the femoral neck, hip, and lumbar spine, while the control group experienced expected age-related bone loss.⁵³ The jump group also showed increases in bone cross-sectional area and muscle mass, which are factors in preventing falls.⁵⁶ 

Program Structure and Cost

The Osteo-Gains app provides a structured 12-month program that is divided into four-week blocks. Users repeat the same session for four weeks before progressing to a new, more challenging block.⁵³ This repetitive and progressive design is based on the protocol used in the research, which the creators state improved compliance and technique.⁵³ The program also includes a four-week "Pre-Conditioning Program" to prepare the body for the impact forces of jumping.⁵³ The app costs a one-time fee of US$24.99 for 14 months of access.⁵³  

Evidence and User Feedback

The primary evidence supporting the Osteo-Gains program comes directly from the research conducted by its creators.⁵² It is important to note that this research focused specifically on  

pre-menopausal women.⁵² While a 2024 meta-analysis of multiple studies confirmed that jump training is beneficial for improving hip bone density in both younger and older adults, it also found that jumping does not appear to significantly increase bone density in the lumbar spine.²¹ 

User reviews for the Osteo-Gains app are mixed. Some users report positive experiences, feeling stronger and appreciating the science-backed approach.⁵⁸ However, a number of users have reported significant technical issues with the app, including problems with video playback, cumbersome account creation, an inability to progress through the program, and a non-functional jump counter.⁵⁹ Several reviewers also expressed frustration with the lack of a free trial period to evaluate the program before purchasing.⁵⁸ The developer has responded to these complaints by stating that a trial period is not offered due to the need to ensure users are properly prepared to tolerate the impact forces safely.⁵⁸ 

Conclusion on Efficacy

The Osteo-Gains program is based on promising research demonstrating that short, specific plyometric exercises can improve bone density and structure, particularly at the hip, in its target demographic of pre-menopausal women.⁵⁴ However, individuals considering the program should be aware of several key points: 

• The primary research was conducted on pre-menopausal women, and its applicability to post-menopausal women or men with osteoporosis has not been established by the same level of evidence.

• Broader meta-analytic evidence suggests that while jump training is effective for the hip, it may not be for the spine.²¹ 

• The app itself has received user complaints regarding technical functionality and usability.⁵⁹ 

• As with any high-impact exercise, it is crucial to ensure proper form and consider contraindications, such as a history of vertebral fractures or poor balance.²¹ 

3. Resistance Training at Moderate Levels (<80% 1RM): A Pathway to Bone Health, Improved Posture, and Fall Reduction

While high-intensity training has garnered significant attention, a robust body of evidence confirms that moderate-intensity resistance training is a safe, accessible, and highly effective strategy for managing osteoporosis. This approach, which utilizes loads below 80% of an individual's one-repetition maximum (1RM), offers a potent stimulus for improving bone density, correcting posture, and reducing the risk of falls.⁶⁰ 

Defining and Evidencing Moderate-Intensity Training

Moderate-intensity resistance training is typically defined as working with loads between 65% and 80% of 1RM.²² In practical terms, this intensity allows for the completion of 8 to 15 repetitions per set, with the final repetitions being challenging but achievable with good form.³³ 

High-level evidence from meta-analyses supports its efficacy:

• Bone Mineral Density (BMD): A 2023 network meta-analysis found that moderate-intensity resistance training was superior to no exercise for improving both lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD in postmenopausal women.²² Another meta-analysis of studies on older adults (using intensities of 70-90% 1RM) found positive effects on hip and spine BMD.⁶² 

• Optimal Frequency: The 2023 meta-analysis also revealed that a training frequency of 3 days per week was superior to 2 days per week for enhancing lumbar spine BMD, identifying this as the optimal strategy for improving BMD across multiple sites.² This suggests that for moderate-intensity work, a more frequent stimulus is more effective. 

Enhancing Posture and Reducing Spinal Load 

A critical benefit of resistance training is its ability to combat the postural decline often seen with osteoporosis, such as thoracic kyphosis (stooped posture).⁶⁰ 

• Strengthening Back Extensors: Exercises that target the back extensor muscles are crucial. Strengthening these muscles helps to pull the spine into a more upright alignment, which can reduce the chronic forward-flexed posture that places excessive compressive load on the front of the vertebrae.³³ 

• Spine-Sparing Movement: Effective postural training must be paired with education on "spine-sparing" strategies for daily life. The most important of these is learning to perform a "hip hinge"—bending at the hips and knees while keeping the spine neutral—for all lifting and bending tasks . This shifts the mechanical load from the vulnerable vertebrae to the powerful muscles of the hips and legs.

Reducing Fall and Fracture Risk

The ultimate goal of any osteoporosis exercise program is to prevent fractures. Moderate-intensity resistance training achieves this by directly targeting the primary cause of most fractures: falls.²² The causal chain is well-established: resistance training increases muscle strength, which in turn improves balance and stability, leading to a significant reduction in the rate of falls . 

Practical Application with Resistance Bands and Bodyweight

A major advantage of moderate-intensity training is its accessibility. It does not require a gym membership or heavy equipment. Resistance bands and bodyweight exercises are highly effective and can be performed at home .

• Effectiveness of Bands: A 2019 meta-analysis concluded that elastic resistance bands can produce strength gains similar to those achieved with conventional weight machines or free weights.⁶³ A 2024 meta-analysis of resistance band studies in older adults with osteoporosis also reported improvements in BMD, muscle mass, and physical function, including lower body strength and mobility.⁶³ 

• Example Exercises:

  • Posture and Back Strength: Seated or standing rows with resistance bands, wall push-ups, and "bird dog" or "superman" exercises are excellent for targeting the upper back and postural muscles .

  • Lower Body Strength and Fall Prevention: Bodyweight squats, sit-to-stands from a chair, lunges, and glute bridges effectively strengthen the major muscles of the legs and hips .

  • Balance: Simple exercises like standing on one leg or heel-to-toe walking, performed daily near a counter for support, can significantly challenge and improve balance .

4. Deconstructing the LIFTMOR Trial: Key Insights for Application

The Lifting Intervention For Training Muscle and Osteoporosis Rehabilitation (LIFTMOR) trial represents a landmark study in the field of exercise and bone health. Its findings challenged long-held beliefs about the safety of high-intensity exercise for individuals with low bone mass and provided powerful insights into the principles of osteogenic loading. A detailed analysis of the trial's methodology—specifically its emphasis on supervision, its duration, and its training frequency—is essential for translating its findings into safe and effective practice.

Trial Overview: A Paradigm Shift in Osteoporosis Exercise

The LIFTMOR trial was a meticulously designed 8-month randomized controlled trial involving postmenopausal women with low bone mass (osteopenia or osteoporosis).⁴² The intervention group participated in a twice-weekly, 30-minute, fully supervised program of high-intensity resistance and impact training (HiRIT).⁴² The protocol was novel and aggressive, centered on four key movements: deadlifts, overhead presses, and back squats performed at a high intensity of  

>80-85% of 1RM for 5 sets of 5 repetitions, supplemented with an impact-loading exercise of jumping chin-ups with forceful drop landings.⁶⁰ 

The results were groundbreaking. Compared to a control group performing a low-intensity, home-based exercise program, the HiRIT group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in BMD at both the lumbar spine and the femoral neck.⁴² Critically, these gains were achieved with a high compliance rate and, within the supervised context of the trial, only one minor adverse event and no fractures were reported.⁴² This directly challenged the prevailing clinical apprehension that high-intensity loading was inherently dangerous for this population, proving that it could be both safe and uniquely effective under the right conditions.⁴² 

The Non-Negotiable Element of Supervision 

The success and safety of the LIFTMOR trial cannot be attributed solely to the exercises themselves. Rather, the "intervention" was the entire clinical process, which was built on three inseparable pillars: selection, preparation, and supervision.⁴⁵ 

• Selection: The trial employed a stringent screening process. Of nearly 600 initial applicants, only about 100 qualified, meaning a vast majority were excluded because they were not deemed healthy or robust enough to safely undertake the demanding protocol.⁴⁵ Participants with significant cardiovascular or musculoskeletal comorbidities were not included, making the final cohort a relatively healthy group of volunteers.⁴⁵ 

• Preparation: Participants did not immediately begin lifting heavy weights. The protocol included a one-month familiarization period where they learned the complex movement patterns of the deadlift, squat, and press using only bodyweight or very low loads. This preparatory phase was crucial for developing technical proficiency before the intensity was increased.⁶⁰ 

• Supervision: This was arguably the most critical component. Every single training session was closely supervised by accredited health and exercise professionals (exercise scientists and physiotherapists) in small groups with a maximum of eight participants per instructor.⁴⁴ This high level of oversight ensured that proper form was maintained on every repetition, that loads were progressed appropriately, and that any potential issues could be addressed immediately. 

The critical lesson from LIFTMOR is not that all individuals with osteoporosis should perform heavy deadlifts, but that high-intensity loading is a powerful osteogenic tool when administered within a highly controlled, supervised clinical framework. Attempting to replicate the LIFTMOR protocol without this comprehensive safety infrastructure is hazardous. The complexity of the lifts, particularly the deadlift, requires expert coaching to execute safely. There are reports of individuals sustaining vertebral compression fractures when attempting to follow the program independently or with inadequately trained supervisors.⁴⁵ Therefore, the LIFTMOR trial should be viewed as a "proof of concept" that validates the principle of high-intensity loading, not as a generic workout routine to be copied from the internet. Its findings should inform practice by encouraging practitioners to apply progressively higher, safe, and well-coached loads, tailored to the individual's capacity. 

The Biological Timeline for Bone Adaptation 

The 8-month duration of the LIFTMOR trial was a deliberate and scientifically informed choice, providing crucial insights into the timeline of bone adaptation.⁴² 

• The Bone Remodeling Cycle: The physiological process of bone remodeling—the coordinated action of osteoclasts removing old bone and osteoblasts laying down new bone—is a lengthy one. A complete remodeling cycle takes approximately 3 to 4 months to complete.⁶⁸ 

• Detection Lag: Even after new bone matrix (osteoid) is formed, there is an additional lag period as it becomes fully mineralized. It is only after sufficient mineralization that the change in density becomes detectable by standard clinical imaging, such as a Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan.⁴² While some studies have detected BMD changes after 6 months of intense intervention, the LIFTMOR researchers strategically chose an 8-month duration to maximize the opportunity to observe a clear and statistically significant treatment effect.⁴² 

• Implication for Practice: Managing Expectations: This biological timeline is a powerful tool for managing patient and client expectations. It provides a clear scientific rationale for why meaningful changes in DXA-measured BMD are not a short-term phenomenon. Explaining that bone adaptation is a slow process and that results on a scan are not expected for at least 6 to 8 months can help combat discouragement and improve long-term program adherence.⁶⁸ It shifts the focus from seeking immediate results to committing to a consistent, long-term process. 

The "Less is More" Principle: Twice-Weekly High-Intensity Training

The decision to use a twice-weekly training frequency in the LIFTMOR trial was also based on fundamental principles of bone physiology, specifically the concept of mechanosensitivity.⁴² 

• Strain Magnitude over Volume: Research from animal models has shown that bone tissue is highly sensitive to the magnitude (how much force) and rate (how quickly the force is applied) of mechanical strain, but it adapts quickly.⁴² The osteogenic response can be triggered by a relatively small number of high-magnitude loading cycles, with diminishing returns from performing many additional cycles on the same day.⁴² This suggests that for stimulating bone, the quality and intensity of the load are more important than the sheer volume or frequency of the exercise. 

• Intensity-Frequency Relationship: A high-intensity stimulus, like that used in LIFTMOR, provides a potent signal for bone adaptation that requires adequate time for recovery and remodeling between sessions. Therefore, a twice-weekly frequency was deemed sufficient to drive adaptation without causing overtraining.⁴² This stands in contrast to the findings for moderate-intensity training, where a higher frequency of 3 days per week was found to be optimal.² This highlights a classic principle of exercise prescription: there is often an inverse relationship between training intensity and optimal training frequency. 

• Implication for Practice: Improving Adherence: This insight can also be used to improve adherence. For clients who feel overwhelmed by the prospect of exercising every day, explaining that a high-quality, high-intensity session performed just twice a week provides the necessary stimulus for their bones can make the program feel more manageable and sustainable.⁴² Qualitative analysis from the LIFTMOR trial confirmed that participants found the program enjoyable and reported feeling stronger, which are key factors in long-term commitment.³¹ 

Conclusion: Synthesizing Evidence into an Integrated, Individualized Exercise Strategy

The comprehensive body of evidence reviewed in this report converges on a clear and consistent conclusion: a structured, individualized, and multi-component exercise program is a safe and effective non-pharmacological cornerstone for the management of osteoporosis. The synthesis of findings from international guidelines, meta-analyses, and landmark clinical trials allows for the formulation of core principles to guide clinical practice.

The gold standard approach is unequivocally a multi-component program that integrates several distinct but complementary types of exercise. This includes: 1) weight-bearing cardiovascular activity to improve general health and provide a baseline stimulus to the skeleton; 2) progressive resistance training to directly increase muscle strength and stimulate bone density at key sites; and 3) challenging balance and postural exercises to improve stability, correct alignment, and directly reduce the risk of falls . Programs that focus on only one of these elements to the exclusion of others are less effective.

Central to any effective program are the principles of specificity and progressive overload. The stimulus must be specific to the desired outcome; for bone, this means prioritizing weight-bearing activities and resistance exercises that load the hip and spine.⁵¹ Furthermore, for adaptation to continue, the load must be progressively increased over time as the body becomes stronger and fitter.⁶ A program that does not evolve will eventually cease to provide an adequate osteogenic stimulus. 

Paramount to all exercise prescription is safety and individualization. The intensity and type of exercise must be carefully tailored to the individual's fracture risk, comorbidities, and fitness level. Movements that are contraindicated, particularly high-impact loading for those at high risk, unsupported spinal flexion, and forceful twisting, must be strictly avoided . The findings from the LIFTMOR trial powerfully demonstrate that while high-intensity loading can be uniquely effective, its safety is contingent upon a framework of rigorous screening and expert supervision, a standard that must be upheld if such protocols are considered.⁴⁵ For the majority of individuals, moderate-intensity resistance training performed 2-3 times per week offers a potent and more broadly applicable strategy for improving bone health and physical function.² 

It is also crucial to recognize that exercise does not occur in a vacuum. Its benefits are maximized when supported by adequate nutrition. The body requires sufficient building blocks to form new bone tissue, making adequate intake of calcium, vitamin D, and protein an essential prerequisite for a successful exercise intervention .

Finally, the most scientifically sound exercise program is rendered ineffective if not performed. Long-term adherence is the ultimate determinant of success. Adherence is a complex behavioral issue influenced by numerous factors, including professional supervision, enjoyment of the activity, and self-efficacy—an individual's belief in their ability to succeed . Therefore, the role of the healthcare and fitness professional is not only to prescribe an effective program but also to educate, motivate, and empower the individual, fostering a collaborative partnership to ensure the chosen activities can be performed consistently and safely for a lifetime.

Looking forward, the field continues to evolve. Emerging research is exploring the potential synergy between exercise and next-generation osteoanabolic drug therapies, which may work in concert to produce additive or synergistic effects on bone strength . Furthermore, advances in genetics and the use of bone turnover biomarkers may one day allow for truly personalized exercise prescriptions, tailored to an individual's unique biological response to different types of mechanical loading . This dynamic landscape underscores the continued importance of evidence-based practice in harnessing the power of exercise to combat osteoporosis and promote lifelong skeletal health.

*NOTE: this article is 100% Google Gemini Deep Research generated.  I built the prompt around current and well supported peer reviewed studies. I have read this in fine detail and post with confidence.

Greg 

Works cited

1. Osteoporosis - Symptoms and causes - Mayo Clinic, https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/osteoporosis/symptoms-causes/syc-20351968
2. Comparative efficacy different resistance training protocols on bone ..., https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9941565/
3. Osteoporosis Physical Therapy | Aurora Health Care, https://www.aurorahealthcare.org/services/physical-therapy-rehabilitation/osteoporosis-care
4. Osteoporosis: Symptoms, Causes and Treatment - Cleveland Clinic, https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/4443-osteoporosis
5. Effects of exercise based on ACSM recommendations on bone mineral density in individuals with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10389279/
6. Effects of exercise based on ACSM recommendations on bone mineral density in individuals with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials - Frontiers, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2023.1181327/full
7. Effects of physical activity/exercise on bone metabolism, bone mineral density and fragility fractures, https://www.journalbonefragility.com/wp-content/uploads/journal/2022/2.1/20-24.pdf
8. Exercise for osteoporosis: how to navigate between overeagerness and defeatism - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5601260/
9. Sclerostin's role in bone's adaptive response to mechanical loading - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5340132/
10. The Mechanosensory Role of Osteocytes and Implications for Bone Health and Disease States - PMC - PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8900535/
11. Exercise - International Osteoporosis Foundation, accessed on June 29, 2025, https://www.osteoporosis.foundation/patients/prevention/exercise
12. Osteoporosis Prevention Through Exercise - Pro+Kinetix Physical Therapy & Performance, https://prokinetixrehab.com/post/osteoporosis-prevention-through-exercise/
13. 9 Best Exercises for Osteoporosis to Strengthen Bones - Hinge Health, https://www.hingehealth.com/resources/articles/osteoporosis-physical-exercise/
14. Exercise interventions and prevention of fall-related fractures in older people: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials | International Journal of Epidemiology | Oxford Academic, https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/46/1/149/2617195
15. Exercising with Osteoporosis, https://exerciseismedicine.org/assets/page_documents/EIM%20Rx%20series_Exercising%20with%20Osteoporosis_2.pdf
16. Exercise and physical activity for osteoporosis and bone health, https://theros.org.uk/information-and-support/osteoporosis/living-with-osteoporosis/exercise-and-physical-activity-for-osteoporosis/
17. Physical Activity Guidelines - ACSM, https://acsm.org/education-resources/trending-topics-resources/physical-activity-guidelines/
18. Is there a synergy between physical exercise and drug therapies for osteoporosis?, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16762158/
19. Does adding exercise or physical activity to pharmacological osteoporosis therapy in patients with increased fracture risk improve bone mineral density and lower fracture risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis - PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10579159/
20. www.osteoporosis.foundation, https://www.osteoporosis.foundation/patients/prevention/exercise#:~:text=Weight%20bearing%20exercise&text=Examples%2C%20such%20as%2C%20dancing%2C,great%20way%20to%20strengthen%20bones.
21. Jump Training for Osteoporosis: Does It Increase Bone Mineral Density? - MelioGuide, https://melioguide.com/weight-bearing/jump-training-osteoporosis/
22. Comparative efficacy different resistance training protocols on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: A systematic review and network meta-analysis - Frontiers, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2023.1105303/full
23. “Too Fit to Fracture” Guidelines for Skeletal Health and Aging, https://www.ucsfcme.com/2018/MEP18001/slides/10_Katzman_Fracture.pdf
24. Too Fit to Fall or Fracture | Osteoporosis Canada, https://osteoporosis.ca/wp-content/uploads/OC-Too-Fit-to-Fall-or-Fracture.pdf
25. Osteoporosis - Vitruvian Exercise Physiology, https://www.vitruvian-ep.co.uk/osteoporosis
26. Exercising with osteoporosis: Stay active the safe way - Mayo Clinic, https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/osteoporosis/in-depth/osteoporosis/art-20044989
27. Strong, steady and straight: exercise recommendations for osteoporosis and bone health, https://www.endocrinology.org/endocrinologist/135-spring20/features/strong-steady-and-straight-exercise-recommendations-for-osteoporosis-and-bone-health/
28. All About Physical Therapy for Osteoporosis - Healthline, 2025, https://www.healthline.com/health/physical-therapy-for-osteoporosis
29. Physiotherapy exercise rehabilitation with tailored exercise adherence support for people with osteoporosis and vertebral fractures: protocol for a randomised controlled trial – the OsteoPorosis Tailored exercise adherence INtervention (OPTIN) study | BMJ Open, https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/9/e064637
30. Exercises to Avoid with Osteoporosis: The Types of Workouts You Probably Shouldn't Do, https://creakyjoints.org/diet-exercise/exercises-avoid-with-osteoporosis/
31. Osteoporosis and exercise | Better Health Channel, https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/conditionsandtreatments/osteoporosis-and-exercise
32. Exercise for optimizing bone health after hormone-induced increases in bone stiffness - Frontiers, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/endocrinology/articles/10.3389/fendo.2023.1219454/full
33. Strong, Steady and Straight: Physical Activity and Exercise for Osteoporosis, https://theros.org.uk/media/0o5h1l53/ros-strong-steady-straight-quick-guide-february-2019.pdf
34. Too Fit to Fracture: - Osteoporosis Canada, https://osteoporosis.ca/wp-content/uploads/OC-Too-Fit-To-Fracture-Osteo-Exercise-Book.pdf
35. Too Fit to Fracture: - Bone Health & Osteoporosis Foundation, https://www.bonehealthandosteoporosis.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/OC-Too-Fit-To-Fracture-Osteo-Exercise-Book.pdf
36. Exercises to avoid with osteoporosis - MedicalNewsToday, https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/what-exercises-should-be-avoided-with-osteoporosis
37. Heavy resistance training is safe and improves bone, function, and stature in postmenopausal women with low to very low bone mass: novel early findings from the LIFTMOR trial - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280872184_Heavy_resistance_training_is_safe_and_improves_bone_function_and_stature_in_postmenopausal_women_with_low_to_very_low_bone_mass_novel_early_findings_from_the_LIFTMOR_trial
38. High-Intensity Resistance and Impact Training Improves Bone Mineral Density and Physical Function in Postmenopausal Women With Osteopenia and Osteoporosis: The LIFTMOR Randomized Controlled Trial - PubMed, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28975661/
39. Exercise for balance - Royal Osteoporosis Society, https://theros.org.uk/information-and-support/osteoporosis/living-with-osteoporosis/exercise-and-physical-activity-for-osteoporosis/exercise-for-balance/
40. Balance, Posture and Functional Exercises - Bone Health & Osteoporosis Foundation, https://www.bonehealthandosteoporosis.org/wp-content/uploads/Balance-Posture-and-Functional-Exercises-2-1.pdf
41. Too Fit To Fracture: - Osteoporosis Canada, https://osteoporosis.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014-07-25-Are-you-too-fit-to-fracture-for-patients.pdf
42. LIFTMOR: Lifting Intervention For Training Muscle and Osteoporosis ..., https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/server/api/core/bitstreams/b6b80b27-44f2-4f82-a315-370c13c7e34f/content
43. The LIFTMOR-M (Lifting Intervention For Training Muscle and Osteoporosis Rehabilitation for Men) trial: protocol for a semirandomised controlled trial of supervised targeted exercise to reduce risk of osteoporotic fracture in older men with low bone mass - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5541517/
44. LIFTMOR Controlled Trial for Osteoporosis and Low Bone Mass - MelioGuide, https://melioguide.com/osteoporosis-exercises/liftmor-osteoporosis-osteopenia/
45. Short, Intense Resistance Training Improves Older Women's Bone ..., https://www.consultant360.com/exclusives/short-intense-resistance-training-improves-older-women-s-bone-strength
46. LIFTMOR-M: Lifting Intervention For Training Muscle and ..., https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/items/a52d5715-df6f-41ec-8f53-31416f537cd0
47. Best Osteoporosis Exercises: Weight-Bearing, Flexibility, and More - WebMD, https://www.webmd.com/osteoporosis/osteoporosis-exercise
48. Osteoporosis exercise program with elastic resistance can reduce fall risk factors, https://www.performancehealthacademy.com/osteoporosis-exercise-program-with-elastic-resistance-can-reduce-fall-risk-factors.html
49. beck-essa-op-position-stand-2017.pdf - Healthy Bones Australia, https://healthybonesaustralia.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/beck-essa-op-position-stand-2017.pdf
50. Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of OsteoStrong® in Postmenopausal Women with Low Bone Mineral Density: A Pilot Study | medRxiv, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.05.23.25328203v1.full-text
51. Prescribing Physical Activity for the Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis in Older Adults - MDPI, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/5/4/85
52. OSTEO-GAINS, https://osteo-gains.com/
53. Learn More — OSTEO-GAINS, https://osteo-gains.com/osteo-gains-app
54. Research — OSTEO-GAINS, https://osteo-gains.com/research
55. Osteogenic Exercises - Physiopedia, https://www.physio-pedia.com/Osteogenic_Exercises
56. Empowering Your Bones: A Home Exercise Guide for Menopausal and Perimenopausal Women - Lane Cove Chiropractic Centre, https://www.lanecovechiropracticcentre.com.au/single-post/empowering-your-bones-a-home-exercise-guide-for-menopausal-and-perimenopausal-women
57. Learn More — OSTEO-GAINS, https://osteo-gains.com/faqs
58. OSTEO-GAINS on the App Store, \https://apps.apple.com/nz/app/osteo-gains/id6736353653
59. OSTEO-GAINS on the App Store, https://apps.apple.com/us/app/osteo-gains/id6736353653
60. Strong, steady, and straight: Physical activity and exercise recommendations for osteoporosis - Physiotutors, https://www.physiotutors.com/strong-steady-and-straight-physical-activity-and-exercise-recommendations-for-osteoporosis/
61. Exercises for osteoporosis - Healthy Bones Australia, https://healthybonesaustralia.org.au/news/exercises-for-osteoporosis/
62. The Effect of Resistance Training on Bone Mineral Density in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - MDPI, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/10/6/1129
63. Resistance Band Exercises for Osteoporosis & Strengthen Bone - MelioGuide, https://melioguide.com/osteoporosis-exercises/resistance-band-exercises-osteoporosis/
64. (PDF) The Effect of Resistance Training on Bone Mineral Density in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361411684_The_Effect_of_Resistance_Training_on_Bone_Mineral_Density_in_Older_Adults_A_Systematic_Review_and_Meta-Analysis
65. Effects of Resistance Exercise on Bone Health - PMC - PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6279907/
66. The-LIFTMOR-Randomized-Controlled-Trial.pdf - Natural Medicine and Rehabilitation, https://www.nmrnj.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/The-LIFTMOR-Randomized-Controlled-Trial.pdf
67. Replicating the LIFTMOR Trial for Osteopenia and Osteoporosis - Schroth DC, https://schrothdc.com/blog/replicating-liftmor-trial
68. The LIFTMOR-M (Lifting Intervention For Training Muscle and Osteoporosis Rehabilitation for Men) trial: protocol for a semirandomised controlled trial of supervised targeted exercise to reduce risk of osteoporotic fracture in older men with low bone mass | BMJ Open, https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/6/e014951.responses
69. EPISODE 91: LIFTMOR, NOT LESS: AN INTERVIEW WITH PROFESSOR BELINDA BECK, https://movementlogictutorials.com/2025/03/27/episode-91-liftmor-not-less-an-interview-with-professor-belinda-beck/